Navigation Area
Research Seminar
Main content
Would you like to be notified about these presentations via e-mail? Please subscribe here.
Autumn Semester 2016
Note: The highlighted event marks the next occurring event.
Date / Time | Speaker | Title | Location | |
---|---|---|---|---|
16 September 2016 15:15-16:00 |
Venkat Chandrasekaran California Institute of Technology, USA |
Learning Semidefinite Regularizers via Matrix Factorization | HG G 19.1 | |
Abstract: Regularization techniques are widely employed in the solution of inverse problems in data analysis and scientific computing due to their effectiveness in addressing difficulties due to ill-posedness. In their most common manifestation, these methods take the form of penalty functions added to the objective in optimization-based approaches for solving inverse problems. The purpose of the penalty function is to induce a desired structure in the solution, and these functions are specified based on prior domain-specific expertise. We consider the problem of learning suitable regularization functions from data in settings in which prior domain knowledge is not directly available. Previous work under the title of 'dictionary learning' or 'sparse coding' may be viewed as learning a polyhedral regularizer from data. We describe generalizations of these methods to learn semidefinite regularizers by computing structured factorizations of data matrices. Our algorithmic approach for computing these factorizations combines recent techniques for rank minimization problems along with operator analogs of Sinkhorn scaling. The regularizers obtained using our framework can be employed effectively in semidefinite programming relaxations for solving inverse problems. (Joint work with Yong Sheng Soh) | ||||
23 September 2016 15:15-16:00 |
Helen Odgen University of Southampton, UK |
Inference with approximate likelihoods | HG G 19.1 | |
Abstract: Many statistical models have likelihoods which are intractable: it is impossible or infeasibly expensive to compute the likelihood exactly. In such settings, a common approach is to replace the likelihood with an approximation, and proceed with inference as if the approximate likelihood were the exact likelihood. For example, in latent variable models, where the likelihood is an integral over the latent variables, a Laplace approximation to the likelihood is often used in place of the exact likelihood to do inference. I will describe general conditions which guarantee that this naive inference with an approximate likelihood has the same first-order asymptotic properties as inference with the exact likelihood, and discuss in detail the implications of these results for inference using a Laplace approximation to the likelihood in generalized linear mixed models. | ||||
28 October 2016 15:15-16:00 |
Samantha Leorato Università Tor Vergata, Roma |
Distribution and Quantile Regressions | HG G 19.1 | |
Abstract: Given a continuous random variable Y and a random vector X defined on the same probability space, the conditional distribution function (CDF) and the conditional quantile function (CQF) give rise to two competing approaches to the estimation of the conditional distribution of Y given X. One approach -- distribution regression -- is based on direct estimation of the conditional distribution function (CDF); the other approach -- quantile regression -- is instead based on direct estimation of the conditional quantile function (CQF). Since the CDF and the CQF are generalized inverses of each other, estimates of any functional of the distribution may be obtained by appropriately transforming the direct estimates of the CDF and the CQ. Similarly, indirect estimates of the CQF and the CDF may be obtained by taking the generalized inverse of the direct estimates. Contrary to the QR estimator, that typically refers to a conditional ALAD estimator, there is no unique choice for the DR estimator. One possibility is to define a binary choice model for any given threshold $y$ and the corresponding dummy variable $\{Y\leq y\}$. This choice is particularly suited to comparisons with the QR estimator, since, in the unconditional case, the two approaches are equivalent. Our paper focuses on comparing QR and DR approaches, and their performances in terms of efficiency, both asymptotically and for finite samples. Asymptotic efficiency is measured by asymptotic MSE of the rescaled estimators of the CDF (or of the CQF), where asymptotic MSE is the sum of the asymptotic variance and of the squared asymptotic bias. Asymptotic bias is allowed to be nonzero, thus taking into account some form of \emph{local} misspecification of either the QR or the DR models. For the asymptotic variance, we show that the choice of the link function used for DR estimation matters, and that under the most popular error distributions (i.e. logistic and normal) the QR is uniformly more efficient (in expectation). The finite sample performance is assessed by an extensive Monte Carlo exercise. | ||||
4 November 2016 15:15-16:00 |
Davy Paindaveine Universität Brüssel |
CANCELED: !!! Inference on the mode of weak directional signals: A Le Cam perspektive on hypothesis testing near singularities | HG G 19.2 | |
Abstract: We revisit, in an original and challenging perspective, the problem of testing the null hypothesis that the mode of a directional signal is equal to a given value. Motivated by a real data example where the signal is weak, we consider this problem under asymptotic scenarios for which the signal strength goes to zero at an arbitrary rate eta_n. Both under the null and the alternative, we focus on rotationally symmetric distributions. We show that, while they are asymptoti- cally equivalent under fixed signal strength, the classical Wald and Watson tests exhibit very different (null and non-null) behaviours when the signal becomes arbitrarily weak. To fully characterize how challenging the problem is as a function of eta_n, we adopt a Le Cam, convergence-of-statistical-experiments, point of view and show that the resulting limiting experiments crucially depend on eta_n. In the light of these results, the Watson test is shown to be adaptively rate-consistent and essentially adaptively Le Cam optimal. Throughout, our theoretical findings are illustrated via Monte Carlo simulations. The practical relevance of our results is also shown on the real data example that motivated the present work. | ||||
17 November 2016 16:15-17:00 |
Gilles Monneret Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris |
Identification of causal relationships in gene networks, from observational and interventional expression data | HG G 19.1 | |
Abstract: Gene network inference from transcriptomic data is a recent and major methodological challenge, usually based on partial correlations within a Gaussian graphical model framework. Recent methodological advances that fully exploit both observational and interventional (i.e., knock-out or knock-down) data go one step further by enabling the inference of causal networks. I will start with a method first proposed by Rau and al.(2013), which is based on Bayesian networks and can use a mix of observationnal and interventionnal data, even with several interventions in the same time. To do so, we use a MCMC procedure that work on the space of topological orders that lead to a posterior probability of ordering. We can then compute, for example, a mean networks for our data. In a second time, I will define a novel causal test to identify marginal causality for each of the interaction pairs. The proposed procedure is very fast and can be applied to thousands of genes simultaneously, which allows the pre-selection of a group of genes of interest for downstream causal network inference around an interventional gene. I will show that we obtain results very similar to differential analysis currently used in genomics. I will illustrate these two method with an application on one example using biological data. | ||||
18 November 2016 15:15-16:00 |
Gabor Lugosi Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
How to estimate the mean of a random variable? | HG G 19.1 | |
Abstract: Given n independent, identically distributed copies of a random variable, one is interested in estimating the expected value. Perhaps surprisingly, there are still open questions concerning this very basic problem in statistics. In this talk we are primarily interested in non-asymptotic sub-Gaussian estimates for potentially heavy-tailed random variables. We discuss various estimates and extensions to high dimensions. We apply the estimates for statistical learning and regression function estimation problems. The methods improve on classical empirical minimization techniques. This talk is based on joint work with Emilien Joly, Luc Devroye, Matthieu Lerasle, Roberto Imbuzeiro Oliveira, and Shahar Mendelson. | ||||
2 December 2016 15:15-16:00 |
Martyn Plummer IARC Lyon, France |
A Bayesian Information Criterion for Singular Models | HG G 19.1 | |
Abstract: We consider approximate Bayesian model choice for model selection problems that involve models whose Fisher information matrices may fail to be invertible along other competing submodels. Such singular models do not obey the regularity conditions underlying the derivation of Schwarz’s Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the penalty structure in BIC generally does not reflect the frequentist large sample behaviour of their marginal likelihood. Although large sample theory for the marginal likelihood of singular models has been developed recently, the resulting approximations depend on the true parameter value and lead to a paradox of circular reasoning. Guided by examples such as determining the number of components of mixture models, the number of factors in latent factor models or the rank in reduced rank regression, we propose a resolution to this paradox and give a practical extension of BIC for singular model selection problems. | ||||
13 December 2016 15:15-16:00 |
William Aeberhard Dalhousie University, Halifax |
Robust fitting of state-space models with application to fish stock assessments | HG G 19.2 | |
Abstract: State-space models (SSMs) encompass a wide range of popular models encountered in various fields such as mathematical finance, control engineering and ecology. SSMs are essentially characterized by a hierarchical structure, with latent (unobserved) variables governed by Markovian dynamics. Classical estimation of fixed parameters in these models, for instance by maximizing an approximated marginal likelihood, is known to be highly sensitive to the correct specification of the model. This sensitivity is all the more so problematic since assumptions about latent variables cannot be verified by the data analyst. Motivated by the highly non-linear models used for fish stock assessments, we introduce robust estimators for general SSMs which remain stable under deviations from the assumed model. The implementation relies on Laplace's method, where automatic differentiation allows the user to robustly fit such a model in a matter of minutes. A real-life fish stock assessment example illustrates the reliable inference these estimators can yield and how robustness weights can be used as diagnostic tools. |
Archive: SS 17 AS 16 SS 16 AS 15 SS 15 AS 14 SS 14 AS 13 SS 13 AS 12 SS 12 AS 11 SS 11 AS 10 SS 10 AS 09